Acta Structuralica

international journal for structuralist research

Series | Book | Chapter

184344

Remarks on human nature in Plato

Stanley Rosen

pp. 151-162

Abstract

The word nature is ambiguous and has undergone various shifts in meaning during its long history. Perhaps the most important of these shifts is that which distinguishes the predominantly classical sense of phusis or natura as divine from the typical modern conception of nature as res extenso or in other words as extension or body in contrast with mind, soul, or spirit. In all epochs going back to classical antiquity, nature has been defined by way of contrast with or opposition to an antonym. The most important of which I am aware are nomos or custom, techne or art, soul, intellect, spirit and history. Each of these antonyms is itself ambiguous and admits of various senses. On the whole, however, it does seem possible to detect a common theme in the diverse understandings of the term "nature." To borrow an expression from Aristotle, nature is that which happens always or for the most part. This is so whether we think of nature as divine or lifeless. Custom, art, and history are all changing.

Publication details

Published in:

Cohen Robert S, Tauber Alfred (1998) Philosophies of nature: the human dimension: in celebration of Erazim Kohák. Dordrecht, Springer.

Pages: 151-162

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-2614-6_11

Full citation:

Rosen Stanley (1998) „Remarks on human nature in Plato“, In: R.S. Cohen & A. Tauber (eds.), Philosophies of nature: the human dimension, Dordrecht, Springer, 151–162.