Acta Structuralica

international journal for structuralist research

Book | Chapter

207196

Literary practice

Anders Pettersson

pp. 163-185

Abstract

The textual-supremacy argument is not the only objection that people tend to raise against the idea that application is aesthetically relevant. I have also pointed to the aesthetic argument, which privileges an aesthetic approach to literature. The textual-supremacy argument may seem more forceful at first sight, but I believe that the aesthetic argument has a comparable intuitive appeal and gives rise to equally fundamental questions about literature as an art.

Publication details

Published in:

Pettersson Anders (2012) The concept of literary application: readers' analogies from text to life. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.

Pages: 163-185

DOI: 10.1057/9781137035424_9

Full citation:

Pettersson Anders (2012) Literary practice, In: The concept of literary application, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 163–185.