Direct and indirect common belief
pp. 355-372
Abstract
We give informal definitions of the concepts of direct and indirect common belief, illustrating them by an example. We then provide an analysis of these concepts within public announcement logic (PAL). The conceptual distinction between direct common belief and indirect common belief is important because it identifies two social phenomena which rely on different forms of agents' cognitive capabilities. It is moreover relevant for speech act theory.
Publication details
Published in:
Konzelmann-Ziv Anita, Schmid Hans Bernhard (2014) Institutions, emotions, and group agents: contributions to social ontology. Dordrecht, Springer.
Pages: 355-372
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-6934-2_22
Full citation:
Lorini Emiliano, Herzig Andreas (2014) „Direct and indirect common belief“, In: A. Konzelmann-Ziv & H.B. Schmid (eds.), Institutions, emotions, and group agents, Dordrecht, Springer, 355–372.